Onda Digital Tv 12But what about man? Just as a good eye should be seen and a good glans should grow, then a good person should…? Is it for what? How are we going to finish this sentence? What do you think? Check. Natural law theory is a theory of law that recognizes a deep connection between law and morality. According to the theory of natural law, only just laws should be kept, while unjust laws can be ignored. Natural law theorists believe that wanting to live a good life is a basic principle of human nature, and therefore human laws should reflect this desire. A more radical critique of the paradigmatic narrative of natural law about the connection between good and law challenges the idea that principles of moral justice can only be obtained from what constitutes an imperfect response to the good. According to this criticism, while it is true that one could develop a concept of irrationality by invoking the notion of what is an erroneous response to human goods, the notion of moral justice belongs to a family of concepts distinct from those to which the concept of reason belongs. From this point of view, moral rectitude belongs to the family of obligations, and the concept of obligation is irreducibly social: one is obliged only if one is subjected to some kind of demand in the context of a social relationship (see for an example of this point of view from a voluntarist theological point of view, Adams 1999, pp. 238-241; see, for an example of this point of view with a Kantian twist, Darwall, 2006). It is part of the logic of the obligation that if one is subject to an obligation, this condition is due to a claim imposed on him by another party. According to this line of criticism, the paradigmatic view of natural law is therefore unable to show that natural law itself is morally authoritative: the commandments of natural law can be rules that all of us humans are obliged to observe, that it would be wrong for us not to obey, and that we would only be guilty if these commandments were imposed on us by an authoritative being – perhaps by a being. like God. It is claimed that the theory of natural law existed without even needing human understanding or any kind of political order or legislation.
To be explained further, natural law involves the idea that humans intrinsically understand the difference between “good” and “evil.” In essence, he concludes that humans are not taught about natural laws; They initiate it by making good and good decisions. Therefore, it is said that it can be found by the exercise of reason. This article has two main purposes. First, it aims to identify the defining characteristics of the moral theory of natural law. Second, it aims to identify some of the main theoretical options facing natural law theorists in order to formulate a precise view in the constraints placed by these defining characteristics, and some of the difficulties for each of these options. However, he will not attempt to tell the story of the development of natural law thought. (For a very useful detailed history of natural law up to early modern times, see Crowe 1977. For a very useful detailed history of natural law thought in modern times, see Haakonssen 1996. For a summary of the entire history of natural law thought, see Haakonssen 1992.) 50The action is to remove the cancer; It has the predictable consequences of the death of the fetus, but this is not intended. The action – removing the cancer – is good (1). The act of removing cancer comes before the fetus dies (2).
The intention to save the woman`s life is also good (3). Finally, the reasons are serious, as they concern the life and death of the woman and the fetus (4). It should be noted that classical naturalism is compatible with giving man an essential role in the production of laws. While the classical naturalist seems committed to the assertion that the law necessarily encompasses all moral principles, this assertion does not imply that the law is exhausted by the set of moral principles. There will always be coordination problems (such as which side of the road to drive on) that can be solved in a variety of ways that are compatible with moral principles.
